LLL Down

[Pure]

Any one else having issues getting on LLL? I'm getting the IE cannot display the page.

 

[casidonacid]

Any one else having issues getting on LLL? I'm getting the IE cannot display the page.

works for me try restarting your computer

 

[jones5233]

Its working for me also. They was doing site work last week but i'm pretty sure they are back up now

 

[SliK JiM]

Any one else having issues getting on LLL? I'm getting the IE cannot display the page.

Use something better than IE!

 

[franzen]

Use something better than IE!

+1
I hate IE. I'm currently using Google Chrome!!

 

[SliK JiM]

+1
I hate IE. I'm currently using Google Chrome!!

Same mate! I made the move from firefox to chrome a few months ago. Definitely a good move! Never use IE. It's ****!

Slight hijack of the thread there! lol!

 

[skyedog]

Actually I had the same thing happen to me about 2am est. I couldn't get on lll to look for bulbs I needed. I did get on this morning though.

 

[Syn]

Same mate! I made the move from firefox to chrome a few months ago. Definitely a good move! Never use IE. It's ****!

Slight hijack of the thread there! lol!

Bit of a highjack as well but...

http://tapthehive.com/this_post_not_made_in_chrome_google_s_eula_is_now_fixed.tth

Since Chrome is a Google product/software, then it is part of the "Services". The content you post to any site is thus subject to Section 11 licensing because the content you post is something "which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services".

In other words, by posting anything (via Chrome) to your blog(s), any forum, video site, myspace, itunes, or any other site that might happen to be supporting you, Google can use your work without paying you a dime. This doesn't just apply to blogger, youtube, gmail etc, and if you think it does, re-read section 1.1 and 11. It applies to everything you pass through Chrome. Google can take your submitted content and edit and reuse it all they want, as long as they do so in connection with Chrome. Even further, you're claiming that you have the power to grant these rights. So the people who work for Conde Nast (Wired, Arstechnica), TechCrunch, Gawker, any of the other big web publishers, or a university research labs probably can't agree to the Chrome ToS because these people most likely don't have the right to give a license to the intellectual property (IP) they produce.