First let me say I NEVER EVER plan to breed chams; I have enough trouble raising human children! (is Potty Mouth the same as mouth rot? )
Anyway - I joined in Dec 08 after mistakenly buying a Jackson's at PetSmart and discovering it was a no-win situation - that chapter is behind me. I've since purchased all the things necessary for a proper enclosure from www.flchams.com; sourced my crickets, roaches, worms, etc, and have secured misting via (www.mistking.com). Very soon I'll have a very pampered and spoiled cham to share my OCD with
While reading all the threads to educate myself about what may happen to my cham during its long life I can't help but stumble upon the myriad of threads regarding breeding. There is no shortage of opinions on containers but I consistently see reference to soil moisture. Moisture seems to be blamed for most of failed clutches. This makes think to myself, "Hmmmm, if moisture is so important - why aren't they using soil moisture meters and/or posting ideal soil moisture data?"
Again - I've taken the "I will never breed oath" so fear not - I'm just wondering why something so important is left to chance by the 'soil squeeze test' I've seen mentioned. If you consider each of us have very different grip strengths then when I squeeze a handful of soil it may yield no water yet another member may squeeze out a shot glass full. Isn't it possible to make this a bit less subjective? Why not establish a forum standard for soil moisture?
Note: My fear is that this is somewhere in another thread and I've neglected to find it so forgive me in advance.
I've searched and found soil Ph and moisture gauges from $11 - $40 with ridiculously expensive commercial units topping $400. I think the $40 unit seems to do the trick but again I'm not sure.
If you consider how important everyone feels digital hygrometers and thermometers for the enclosure, it seems that soil moisture should be given the same level of accuracy if possible.
Cheepy for $13
This one measures sunlight-Ph-Moisture for $40
I don't doubt many have been successful without such fancy gizmos but for the up and coming breeders I would think this is something they need to get right.
Anyway - I joined in Dec 08 after mistakenly buying a Jackson's at PetSmart and discovering it was a no-win situation - that chapter is behind me. I've since purchased all the things necessary for a proper enclosure from www.flchams.com; sourced my crickets, roaches, worms, etc, and have secured misting via (www.mistking.com). Very soon I'll have a very pampered and spoiled cham to share my OCD with
While reading all the threads to educate myself about what may happen to my cham during its long life I can't help but stumble upon the myriad of threads regarding breeding. There is no shortage of opinions on containers but I consistently see reference to soil moisture. Moisture seems to be blamed for most of failed clutches. This makes think to myself, "Hmmmm, if moisture is so important - why aren't they using soil moisture meters and/or posting ideal soil moisture data?"
Again - I've taken the "I will never breed oath" so fear not - I'm just wondering why something so important is left to chance by the 'soil squeeze test' I've seen mentioned. If you consider each of us have very different grip strengths then when I squeeze a handful of soil it may yield no water yet another member may squeeze out a shot glass full. Isn't it possible to make this a bit less subjective? Why not establish a forum standard for soil moisture?
Note: My fear is that this is somewhere in another thread and I've neglected to find it so forgive me in advance.
I've searched and found soil Ph and moisture gauges from $11 - $40 with ridiculously expensive commercial units topping $400. I think the $40 unit seems to do the trick but again I'm not sure.
If you consider how important everyone feels digital hygrometers and thermometers for the enclosure, it seems that soil moisture should be given the same level of accuracy if possible.
Cheepy for $13
This one measures sunlight-Ph-Moisture for $40
I don't doubt many have been successful without such fancy gizmos but for the up and coming breeders I would think this is something they need to get right.