Chameleon Company
Avid Member
This is where I become a bit confused, is it possible for something that seems like a mutt to actually be real pedigree? and if so how can someone whose a novice differentiate between the two? Personally I'd rather not cross my fingers and hope for the best, I'd feel better knowing that I can be better assured that im truly getting what I payed for and expecting.
Yes, it is possible for something that appears non-traditional to actually be pedigree. But you would need to get opinions from a very small group of folks who had seen enough of what really exists in the wild, and is legitimately possible, to render you that consensus that some others might respect. Even then, you are back to having to convince folks that the chameleon that doesn't look like an Ambilobe really is an Ambilobe . As a hobbyist or small-time breeder, or anyone that hopes to make a few shekals from offspring, I would always advise that you go to the most typical and colorful specimens of a locale that define your expectations for your breeding stock.
We must always remind ourselves that Locales are not species. They are not always distinct enough to be ... well ... distinct enough ! What they are is a way to label and market our animals, such that someone else will agree with our labels, if not actually seek them out. Call it a common language within panthers. My Ambanja female with someone else's Ambanja male will produce baby Ambanjas for you to sell to others who recognize them as Ambanjas. There will always be legitimate fringes. Some of us have fun and enjoyment spending some time and effort in the fringes, but only after we have the mainstream expectations covered first.
Nick ... got me laughing too. Many that go back in this business know all about producing "Kalambilobes", and other "fringes" that even Mother Nature would scorn. A few that read here will know exactly of which I speak. Otherwise, Brad would frown on further explanation, and I concur.