reyesjoshuacruz
Established Member
Ill keep it short and sweet
Chris: Wow, that may have been one of the most complicated things I've ever tried to read"
what was the point of this comment? was it necessary? or should i say chris: "(although I really don't get what that has to do with anything)" about your comment in turn
Chris: "but if I understand what you said, you seem to be confused about the point of the video............that isn't the issue. The issue in the video was that they are not easy animals to keep in captivity, are not suitable for the majority of individuals who might want to keep them, have care requirements that are complex "
"=mos def when i got my first veild i was wet behind the ears and thought i could not do] it iv had snakes my whole life and herd nothing but bad storys about keeping the (coolest things iv ever seen in my life)"
doesnt look like he missed the point at all, maybe you should re read what he posted.....if you need help figuring out where he was talking about how cham keeping wasnt easy let me know........
try starting with the definition of "wet behind the ears" :The allusion is to the inexperience of a baby, so recently born as to be still wet.
INEXPERIENCE!?!?!?....... do i really have to explain how that relates and is on topic? cause i will, or " bad storys about keeping " as we are on a cham forum i wont explain how easily one can draw the conclusion that he is referring to the horror stories of keepers not meeting the complex req of this animal... again on topic
Chris: "No one really cares if chameleons are cool"
?????????????? of course they do............. if no one thinks they are cool, no one will fight to protect them. humans wont fight to save something they dont like, or think is cute....
Chris: "and that the means by which they are exported and shipped might not be in the best interest of all the individual chameleons involved in the process, not just the ones that make it to keepers in the US or Europe. The majority of what he said is completely true"
when did he state it wasnt true?
chris :" regardless of whether or not chameleons are cool or if they are a grounding influence from your snowboarding/skateboarding hobby (although I really don't get what that has to do with anything). "
you prob didnt skate or snowboard, or you would have made the connection between the time, money, sacrafice..... overall commitment thatsnowboarding/skateboarding hobbies and cham keeping command........ now that its clear his old hobbies required such a commitment you can understand how keeping chams is an equal commitment for him and thus further exposing his grasp on the issue, which is that chameleons arent for everyone ( time, money, sacrafice..... overall commitment )
chris: "You miss the point. To hell with what makes us happy if we prematurely kill all the animals we work with to make us that way. "
it seems like you are under the impression he feels as long as he is happy, that collection/ export nightmare is ok....i dont think i read anywhere that he even commented on the collection/export nightmare ??? where was that?
chris : "The point of the video was that not everyone can provide for chameleons in a way that makes it worth their losses. They are an animal that needs a lot of considerations before someone decides to take them on and that the processes by which they used to arrive to us were not always justifiable to the ends (making us happy). I'm not saying no one should work with them but I think too many people do who shouldn't in the first place."
hopefully now that its clear he was on topic with a clear grasp of concept, this is a moot point, you basically just restating
chris :Like the connotation of the video or not, he was dead on during most of it."
again when did he say he wasnt????? i havent even seen the video yet............. and these points are still apparent
Chris: Wow, that may have been one of the most complicated things I've ever tried to read"
what was the point of this comment? was it necessary? or should i say chris: "(although I really don't get what that has to do with anything)" about your comment in turn
Chris: "but if I understand what you said, you seem to be confused about the point of the video............that isn't the issue. The issue in the video was that they are not easy animals to keep in captivity, are not suitable for the majority of individuals who might want to keep them, have care requirements that are complex "
"=mos def when i got my first veild i was wet behind the ears and thought i could not do] it iv had snakes my whole life and herd nothing but bad storys about keeping the (coolest things iv ever seen in my life)"
doesnt look like he missed the point at all, maybe you should re read what he posted.....if you need help figuring out where he was talking about how cham keeping wasnt easy let me know........
try starting with the definition of "wet behind the ears" :The allusion is to the inexperience of a baby, so recently born as to be still wet.
INEXPERIENCE!?!?!?....... do i really have to explain how that relates and is on topic? cause i will, or " bad storys about keeping " as we are on a cham forum i wont explain how easily one can draw the conclusion that he is referring to the horror stories of keepers not meeting the complex req of this animal... again on topic
Chris: "No one really cares if chameleons are cool"
?????????????? of course they do............. if no one thinks they are cool, no one will fight to protect them. humans wont fight to save something they dont like, or think is cute....
Chris: "and that the means by which they are exported and shipped might not be in the best interest of all the individual chameleons involved in the process, not just the ones that make it to keepers in the US or Europe. The majority of what he said is completely true"
when did he state it wasnt true?
chris :" regardless of whether or not chameleons are cool or if they are a grounding influence from your snowboarding/skateboarding hobby (although I really don't get what that has to do with anything). "
you prob didnt skate or snowboard, or you would have made the connection between the time, money, sacrafice..... overall commitment thatsnowboarding/skateboarding hobbies and cham keeping command........ now that its clear his old hobbies required such a commitment you can understand how keeping chams is an equal commitment for him and thus further exposing his grasp on the issue, which is that chameleons arent for everyone ( time, money, sacrafice..... overall commitment )
chris: "You miss the point. To hell with what makes us happy if we prematurely kill all the animals we work with to make us that way. "
it seems like you are under the impression he feels as long as he is happy, that collection/ export nightmare is ok....i dont think i read anywhere that he even commented on the collection/export nightmare ??? where was that?
chris : "The point of the video was that not everyone can provide for chameleons in a way that makes it worth their losses. They are an animal that needs a lot of considerations before someone decides to take them on and that the processes by which they used to arrive to us were not always justifiable to the ends (making us happy). I'm not saying no one should work with them but I think too many people do who shouldn't in the first place."
hopefully now that its clear he was on topic with a clear grasp of concept, this is a moot point, you basically just restating
chris :Like the connotation of the video or not, he was dead on during most of it."
again when did he say he wasnt????? i havent even seen the video yet............. and these points are still apparent
Last edited by a moderator: