I place the eggs an inch apart because then the eggs will hatch more individually and I feel it helps with the survival rate. In the wild they would all hatch at once and some might not be quite ready (if you know what I mean)...but they have to do this to be able to dig out of the ground. The weaker ones would either get eaten by something or just die and the strong/quick would survive...as is nature's way.
Indeed. raises the question of weather saving all of them in captivity weakens the gene pool in the long term, also raises the question of culling. Ive read it brought up here before and folk were all horrified at the idea. Does any non commercial breeder cull weak hatchlings? Will they dare admit to it here?
Is it just an emotional thing, or a dollar thing? (humane euthanasia being $$$)
Is it kinder to cull or let nature take its course and allow weaker ones to die?
I make sure any animal I allow to breed is in the best possible condition, and I dont allow
continued clutches (some multi clutch anyway and here I allow two clutches and freeze any further eggs), this ensures young are robust and not effected by nutritional/calcium depletion of the mother, which I make a big effort to prevent.
I give all young equal quality of care, but make no extra effort to save any weak ones,
if they dont make it, so be it, as in nature.
note: this does not mean I allow any kind of suffering, just that I dont 'cotton wool'
them. Its not only the health of the mother that concerns me, I want to be atleast reasonably sure any young have the best chance of survival.
They go out into the world alone (to other keepers) as In nature, and I dont 'vet' buyers beyond a few questions about basic care and setup.
Ive been known to provide free equipment to those who it turned out, didnt have the basics at point of sale, that done, my conscience is clear, you cant do much once they've gone, though I do always provide advice post sale.