We both do agree. I just don't like to spread that veileds are worst... But yes, they are all diff.
In no way did I mean that. Personally I do not believe any animal to be "bad" or "the worst". It is sad that many people actually use these words to describe some pets.
People say that having a tiger makes for a "bad" pet because the tiger would be aggressive, or need a large territory. People say that alligators make bad pets because they can kill you. People say that birds are dirty and thus are bad pets.
All this is so untrue, and sadly people eat it up like candy.
Yes, tigers are aggressive and need a large territory, yes alligators can hurt you, and yes... some birds are dirty. But this does not make them bad!
Each animal has its own needs and requirement to have a healthy life. It is up to the keeper to decide if he can meet those needs and provide those requirements, if he cannot he should not be considering that animal as a pet.
Veiled chameleons get the rap for being the more aggressive chameleon, but in no way does that make them the worst chameleon. I do not think that word could ever apply to any of these beautiful creatures. People are just very naive at times and think that an aggressive chameleon will make a bad pet and so purchase a panther, or a jacksons or some other species. In the end they usually end up getting bit just as bad as if a veiled had done it.
That moluccan I was talking about, I got for pennies on the dollar. Because everyone regarded him as a "bad animal" and thus not a good pet. If anyone did anything he did not respond well to he would bite them very hard.
But with proper training it is now to the point that if I pet him somewhere he doesn't like or do something in general that upsets him - he will take my finger in his mouth. He does not apply pressure, or chomp down or anything. Its just his way of saying "I don't like that"