Fool
New Member
I wanted to know the reason why the lights were bad and stuff and i came across this in this guys page on another forum
Does this mean the same for the exoterra repti glow 5.0? what do you guys think heres his full report about the 5.0 compact issue just something to read for those that didnt or dont know. the page goes to here
http://www.beardeddragon.org/bjive/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=112482
In March this year, I tested two ExoTerra ReptiGlo 10.0 26W coils and these two are completely different to the version I tested in 2008.
The 2009 lamps even have a different shaped base (more like a cylinder than the cup-shape they had before) so they are probably made by a different company. The UVB output is much lower overall - making it one of the weaker 10.0 compact lamps available - but it still has a higher proportion of its output in the shorter wavelengths, so the spectrum is not what I consider optimal, although there is almost nothing below 290nm in this latest version.
Because of the very low output, these lamps are in my opinion extremely unlikely to cause eye problems if used at sensible distances (eg. 10 - 12 inches).
Here are some sample readings, all measured from the side of a bare lamp held vertically in a fixture with no reflector or dome, and no screen, at 12 inches distance:
Brand new lamp (30mins): 14 µW/cm² and UV Index 0.9
Lamp after 105 hrs (approx 10 days use): 13 µW/cm² and UV Index 0.7
Lamp after 750 hrs (approx 2.5 months use): 11 µW/cm² and UV Index 0.6
I have two of these on longterm testing right now and they will reach 1,000 hours (3 months) soon, so I hope to complete a proper report then.
Does this mean the same for the exoterra repti glow 5.0? what do you guys think heres his full report about the 5.0 compact issue just something to read for those that didnt or dont know. the page goes to here
http://www.beardeddragon.org/bjive/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=112482