New Lens New Pics.
- Thread starter Deadpool
- Start date
Chameleons Northwest
Avid Member
Beautiful photos.
Hate to bring this up, but- did he draw his eyes inward when you approached with the camera, or are his eyes always sunken like that? I know they draw them in on purpose sometimes, especially in front of a camera.
Hate to bring this up, but- did he draw his eyes inward when you approached with the camera, or are his eyes always sunken like that? I know they draw them in on purpose sometimes, especially in front of a camera.
Zerah Morris
New Member
Nice picks, and a good looking cham as well. On a side note you need to look for a quality resize action for Photo Shop, or write one on your own for web publishing. If you need help with one pm me.
Chameleons Northwest
Avid Member
That was due to the camera and the shower she received just moments before.
Oh and I thought the Deadpool name looked suspicious lol
Ah. Thank you. Beautiful. Nice job with the camera, too.
ChrisnLisa
New Member
Very nice pictures!
Thanks, i know how to resize though. These shots are originally around 9-10 MB large, I shrunk it down enough so I believe you get a full and detailed view of it. I got others on my DA account on the link there.
I also wanna thank everyone who has replied to my pictures, I appreciate it! I wish I could get pictures of Athena but even since her experience with having medicine forced into her mouth she really hates any human contact. The only contact she's okay with is the tongs with food in them.
Thanks! The camera is a Canon Rebel SLR XTi 10MP, and the lens is an EFS 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Hmmm... I'm not 100% sure if it will or not, but if it's build just like the XTi I'm sure it will fit it.
Yup, all natural lighting.
Zerah Morris
New Member
Interesting. If the original file is only 9-10 MB you resized it to 1.5 MB. However most of us could care less about the file size but the image size. No one wants to scroll around to see the picture, my Mac display is at 1680x1050 and I still cannot see the whole thing at once in the browser. You also sacrifice image quality for IE users as their browser, depending on setting will resize it and cause it not to be viewed at a 1:1 ratio throwing the quality of the image off adversely.
A quality macro shot does not require "size" to display the detail of the capture in a web format. (In print an argument for size could be made) In fact not being able to see the entire image at once makes it difficult to make out the reference detail to begin with.
Last edited:
I suppose, but I prefer letting the viewer getting this overwhelming sense of size when looking at a macro shot. An overwhelming large photo of something we see as a daily minuscule object to be seen so big.
Orchidartist
New Member
Amazing photographs! The water droplets look ready to drip off my monitor!
