Incubation Diapause & Temperature Selection

Chris Anderson

Dr. House of Chameleons
I've been brushing up on some reproductive biology research, particularly how it relates to chameleons, and I thought it would be useful to mention a few things keepers/breeders tend to ignore.

We all know that high incubation temperatures tend to result in weak hatchlings. Our response to that knowledge, however, it simply to use cooler incubation temperatures, rather than try to think about the optimal incubation strategies.

Interestingly, many oviparous chameleon species have what is called embryonic diapause where there is an arrest of embryonic development that is controlled endogenously. Embryonic diapause isn't broken by increasing temperature or providing otherwise appropriate environmental conditions for development. This is different than other types of diapause that are induced by environmental conditions (temperature, oxygen levels, etc.). Chameleons are actually the only lizards or snakes that have embryonic diapause. Not all chameleons have embryonic diapause, however (Brookesiinae, for example, don't seem to). Clearly this embryonic diapause effects incubation though and its important to consider why such an endogenous arrest would evolve.

Its also interesting to note that chameleons are some of the few lizards or snakes that naturally tend to lay their eggs before winter, thus forcing their clutches to extend through a period where temperatures are not conducive to development. What embryonic diapause does is prevent development immediately after a clutch is laid before winter temperatures kick in and stop development until temperatures improve. It essentially protects the embryo and ensures it doesn't begin to develop before winter sets in.

Now studies have shown that when clutches are not exposed to these low temperatures shortly after a clutch is laid, embryos within a clutch break the embryonic diapause and begin development over a wide range of time. The result is that the clutches hatch out over an extended period of time rather than all at once. When these clutches are exposed to a low temperature period shortly after being laid, the entire clutch breaks the embryonic diapause some time before temperatures increase and the environmentally induced diapause holds the development of the entire clutch until temperatures increase. The result is that these clutches tend to hatch in much closer proximity to each other. Additionally, hatchlings from clutches that were not exposed to an environmental diapause but were instead incubated at a constant temperature tend to have lower masses when they hatch than clutches that are exposed to an environmental diapause.

Now, appropriate diapause periods can vary from species to species and, unfortunately, limited information is available on the appropriate diapause lengths for different species. That said, there is strong support for the idea that a constant incubation temperature for many chameleon species is far from ideal (including calyptratus and pardalis). A 3 or 4 month temperature drop shortly after a clutch is laid followed by incubating at a more typical incubation temperature may improve the strength of neonates and possibly even shorten the overall length of incubation in some species by triggering the end of embryonic diapause.

Just some food for thought, particularly for people thinking about breeding...

Chris
 
Thank you for posting this.

Who did the study and has it been published somewhere?

Any idea what percent or how many degrees lower than normal to drop the temp at first?

What would be considered normal? For example- most people nowadays incubate panthers and veileds at slightly warm room temp (maybe 75?) is that considered normal or is normal the temps of yesteryear (around 82-84?) and nowadays temps considered lower already?

(In other words 3 months at 75, then raise to 82 for good results? Or would it be 3 months at 65 or 70, then raise to 75?)

Sorry for the Q's- your info is sort of big news to me- last I heard nobody had solved how to effect diapose, so I would very much like to understand what you are saying. I'll bet this especially has ramifications for those working with long incubation time species like parsons.
 
I've always used fluctuating temperatures with my veileds and panthers and temperature ranges around 76F. I've had an almost perfect hatch rate and survival rate...but never connected it with the fluctuating temperatures as such. I just never changed what worked.
 
Thank you for posting this.

Who did the study and has it been published somewhere?

Any idea what percent or how many degrees lower than normal to drop the temp at first?

What would be considered normal? For example- most people nowadays incubate panthers and veileds at slightly warm room temp (maybe 75?) is that considered normal or is normal the temps of yesteryear (around 82-84?) and nowadays temps considered lower already?

(In other words 3 months at 75, then raise to 82 for good results? Or would it be 3 months at 65 or 70, then raise to 75?)

Sorry for the Q's- your info is sort of big news to me- last I heard nobody had solved how to effect diapose, so I would very much like to understand what you are saying. I'll bet this especially has ramifications for those working with long incubation time species like parsons.

Surprises me this was overlooked part of modern breeding. To clue more people in to what is going on I have used diapause successfully for breeding F. verrucousus and F. lateralis. While a while ago 1995-1997 it was widely believed by me and from some of my older chameleon breeder friends that most all species from eastern Madagascar that live in cooler temperature probably required a cooler diapause for successful incubation.
 
Last edited:
You said..."Now studies have shown that when clutches are not exposed to these low temperatures shortly after a clutch is laid, embryos within a clutch break the embryonic diapause and begin development over a wide range of time. The result is that the clutches hatch out over an extended period of time rather than all at once"...any speculation on why they would hatch over such an extended period of time and have such a small mass? Does the mass vary with the number of days it takes for them to hatch or are they all approximately the same mass regardless of when they hatch?

You said..."Embryonic diapause isn't broken by increasing temperature"...the following site says..."development was initiated about 10 days earlier for eggs in the high temperature treatment compared to eggs in the low temperature treatment."...how can this be then??
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15286942

Is this one of the papers where you got the information...
http://www.biol.vt.edu/faculty/andrews/Diapaus08.pdf

Another interesting paper not quite on topic though..."Aggregation protects flexible-shelled reptile eggs from severe hydric stress"...
http://www.springerlink.com/content/4032m356l66k66u3/
 
Last edited:
Who did the study and has it been published somewhere?

Its a series of studies by various researchers with some of it being published and some not but Robin Andrews has done a lot of excellent work on the topic. Lynda linked to a couple of her articles I was referencing above and here: https://www.chameleonforums.com/eggs-43922/

Any idea what percent or how many degrees lower than normal to drop the temp at first?

It will depend on the species but down around 60 degrees F is probably appropriate for most.

What would be considered normal? For example- most people nowadays incubate panthers and veileds at slightly warm room temp (maybe 75?) is that considered normal or is normal the temps of yesteryear (around 82-84?) and nowadays temps considered lower already?

Again, it will depend on the species since some require cooler temps than others. Veileds, for instance, seem to have the best survival and hatching size combination incubates at around 82 according to these studies.

You said..."Now studies have shown that when clutches are not exposed to these low temperatures shortly after a clutch is laid, embryos within a clutch break the embryonic diapause and begin development over a wide range of time. The result is that the clutches hatch out over an extended period of time rather than all at once"...any speculation on why they would hatch over such an extended period of time and have such a small mass? Does the mass vary with the number of days it takes for them to hatch or are they all approximately the same mass regardless of when they hatch?

Why they hatch over an extended period simply has to do with variation in when the signals driving and maintaining embryonic diapause stop inhibiting further development. The duration of the incubation after embryonic diapause is broken is fairly consistent within a temperature treatment, its just when that diapause breaks. As for why mass varies depending on whether that embryonic diapause is met with an environmentally induced diapause, it could be a number of reasons, possibly hormonal, but I haven't found an explanation of why for that.

You said..."Embryonic diapause isn't broken by increasing temperature"...the following site says..."development was initiated about 10 days earlier for eggs in the high temperature treatment compared to eggs in the low temperature treatment."...how can this be then??
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15286942

That study didn't actually look at embryonic diapause followed the environmentally induced diapause I was talking about. During embryonic diapause, gastrulation and development of the precursor of the yolk sac and chorioallantoic membrane still occurs until this precursor reaches a critical size. Temperature will effect how long it takes for gastrulation to result in that precursor reaching that critical size and thus how quickly embryonic diapause is broken, but increasing the temps won't just break the embryonic diapause despite the size of the precursor. With an additional environmental diapause, once the precursor reaches that critical size, progression of the next stage in development is arrested until temperatures are increased.

Is this one of the papers where you got the information...
http://www.biol.vt.edu/faculty/andrews/Diapaus08.pdf

Yup, that is one of them.

Chris
 
Surprises me this was overlooked part of modern breeding. To clue more people in to what is going on I have used diapause successfully for breeding F. verrucousus and F. lateralis.

Me too for lateralis as far back as early 90s. I think when I bred oustallets and campani as well (too many years ago).

However- in labratory settings in published papers they were unable to shorten or lengthen diapose duration by manipulation of temperatures in species like vieleds and panthers. (see papers published by andrews). That is what is so exciting about this new info- they have found the key perhaps to shorten it in species like calyptratus or pardalis.
 
Last edited:
Robin Andrews

Whoa- it is Robin Andrews- last study I read of hers she had not been able to shorten diapose. This is a breakthrough for her as well then. Congrats go to her- for those unfamiliar with her work- she's probably the worlds foremost expert on lizard incubation. She's been working on breaking diapose in chameleon eggs for a number of years. Cheers to Dr Andrews!
 
Last edited:
That temp of 60 sorta makes sense. It would be close to temp of the earth if it wasn't warmed much during the winter months in some of these places probably.
 
Great information Chris. Thanks for sharing this. I, too, look forward to hearing you speak in August. :)
 
It's got to be a completely different mechanism, but horticulturists would not be at all surprised by the embryonic diapause - a wide variety of temperate range plant seeds will not germinate immediately but await various signals (temperature, sometimes daylength) so as to germinate in favorable conditions in the spring.
 
Flux,

I'm not sure what you mean by shortening the diapause. I commented that by providing a diapause, it may be possible to shorten the overall length of incubation for some species (a 12 month incubation period for a species that lays its clutches in the late fall just does not make sense), but I'm not sure what you meant by shortening diapause. Unfortunately I don't think enough is known about the optimal diapause durations for enough species to be able to pin down an exact ideal period but everything suggests that for a lot of species a diapause will aid in hatching results.

Chris
 
Well what I meant was previously incubation might be 6 months or it might be 11 for say calyptratus. Andrews had taken different approaches to temp and water content (if I remember rightly) to try and break diapause at points after it had started so for example a hatch date could be predicted and it wouldn't be 11 months but would be 6 or better yet 5 (for example- I'm working from memory and making up extreme times here for conversation- don't remember enough about her study to reproduce the exact content for you). That still isn't saying it right- I think she had fairly consistant durations but was unable to do anything to end diapause- there that perhaps says it more accurately.

She found no differences in duration of diapause no matter what temps and moisture content she tried to use to manipulate and break diapause.

However, if I remember rightly, she was trying after eggs had gone into diapause on their own.

If I remember rightly in normal incubation there is a little development, then diapause, then lots of development to hatching normally.

Diapause previously had an uncontrollable duration that varied sometimes wildly. Sounds like now the first step (the short period of development) can be skipped and diapause induced immediately and then ended on cue after a reasonable duration.

So I guess that is all I mean by shortening diapause- that from what you have posted it can now be ended on cue after a reasonably minimal duration for a particular species. If this is possible- 11 month calyptratus can be a thing of the past because their diapause which took longer than those that hatched at 6 months can now be shortened. (personally over the years I've had a clutch of calyptratus hatch at 5 1/2 months and at the other extreme a 13 month clutch hatch).

Which is why I say it has been shortened. I don't mean it is unnecessary and you can do a day or two and then break out of it or chop a week or two off the end of it. I just mean the extreme diapause durations are no longer necessary according to this, and now we can choose not to have them. Maybe with future tweaks on the procedure, we can learn the minimal time needed before breaking diapause for various species and shorten incubation duration even further.

If I am understanding correctly- this is really exciting stuff!
 
Last edited:
Flux...why would you want to shorten diapause? I think its best to just let nature take its course because manipulating what nature has set out might alter other things and you might end up with unhealthy babies.
 
Back
Top Bottom