Thanks for all your replies here i am done this has gone no where but a bickering match i don't have time for.I came here to ask a few questions and some info was given thank you but name calling and such im done with
Thank you all
Correct. Not comparing each other to each. JUST asking a question has anyone tested this thought without UV fully that's all nothing more nothing less.I never said i did use UV with all the chams we produced which was years ago just asked a question geeze.
Just trying to see whats been tested. Not trying to prove anyone wrong or right just stating reports and asking if others tested this with chams as with other lizards have. A name is a NAME just cause it says cham king dosnt mean anything as you think.I don't claim to be its just a name.
Yes and no i've seen both ways. So all im asking is has anyone tested it FULLY without UV with chams.I personly dont use UV with other lizards and have great success in breeding,egg laying and hatching and never lost one to MBD and i know of many also who had same results.
Their hasnt been written papers on it for them just breeders who used that method and have had excellent results without for iggys and beadies.So that brought me to the question has anyone ever tested it fully without as many species other than chams that were said to need it have been...
Is their any result for testing without as you cant test one way and once it has to be tested for generations. yes it wont hurt using it as it shows but CANT IT BE NOT USED is the question and what are the results
So can Iggys and beaded dragons but its been proven without it with many generations has it been proven with chameleons not to my knowledge.Everyone is afraid to test this as they see a ad for UV lights in a mag or else where and people believe what is said with no proven long term results its...